When we have passed beyond knowings, then we shall have knowledge. Reason was the helper, Reason is the bar.
Sunday, January 24, 2021
Ideal of the overman becomes a task which the state has now to support
Monday, January 18, 2021
What a social world without alienation would look like
A dream of democratic socialismby Amod Lele |
Martin Hägglund develops a neo-Marxist politics that is deeply informed by qualitative individualism – quite appropriately, since qualitative individualist ideas inform Marx himself, especially in the theory of alienation. Hägglund wants to envision what a social world without alienation would look like.
Possibly the core distinction in Hägglund's thought is between a "realm of freedom" and a "realm of necessity" – and he identifies time as central to both of these.
Amod, you remind me of Richard Rorty in this post. Here is one of my favorite Rorty quotes—it comes from his essay on George Orwell in his book Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity: “I do not think that we liberals can now imagine a future of ‘human dignity, freedom and peace.’ That is, we cannot tell ourselves a story about how to get from the actual present to such a future. We can picture various socioeconomic setups which would be preferable to the present one. But we have no clear sense of how to get from the actual world to these theoretically possible worlds, and thus no clear idea of what to work for…. This inability to imagine how to get from here to there is a matter neither of loss of moral resolve nor of theoretical superficiality, self-deception, or self-betrayal. It is not something we can remedy by a firmer resolve, or more transparent prose, or better philosophical accounts of man, truth, or history. It is just the way things happen to have fallen out. Sometimes things prove to be just as bad as they first looked.…This bad news remains the great intransigent fact of contemporary political speculation, the one that blocks all the liberal scenarios.” (Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, 1989, p. 181-182)
Idols of the Mind vs. True Reality
https://www.amazon.com/Idols-
https://www.amazon.in/Idols-
Ontological Distinction between Mechanical, Chemical & Biological Systems
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
Sunday, November 22, 2020
ଘନଚେତନାର ଏଇ ଅମାର ଭିତରେ କ'ଣ କିଛି ଅଭାବ ଥିଲା
Sunday, November 01, 2020
Savitri is the ambassadress
- Onward, and Upward, Beyond the Supramental Manifestation - There is little reason to suppose that once the supramental manifestation takes place, that evolution will at that point come to a halt. Humanity has been ...
- Countering narratives against Hinduism during Kartika Masam in Odisha - In this auspicious lunar month we try to inculcate some noble qualities to march in the path of Bhakti and shed negative attributes of our body-mind. The...
- The Academik Genius Brothers – The Making Off… ep.5 - *THE ACADEMIK GENIUS BROTHERS * Present *The Making Off* of the Show: *” THE GREAT EXPECTATIONS OF PRINCESS POUR TOUS*” A Regular Radio Series of 14 E...
- Covid Losses and Encouraging signs - *Covid Losses and Encouraging signs* Let us not allow any *identity to limit our frames of references and restrict our forms of preferences and pe...
- Decision Making (TE 285) - This talk touches upon various aspects of decision-making such as choices and their consequences; making a conscious choice; ego-driven and true individu...
- David Loy’s “The Suffering System” - It is not difficult to understand what people mean when they say that our problems are “systemic”, especially after you read Buddhist sociologist David Loy...
- Reading the Yu Fu - If, reading the Yu Fu, downy cheeks blush apples Or, Sky catfished, Thy Me Too cloud dapples Not Love fails save in such folk-song or story As where Beauty...
- Experience between the secular and the divine: Conclusion - Why have religious philosophers and theologians been drawn to phenomenology in particular? The essays in this forum suggest several answers to this question.
- A New Book on The Bhagavad Gītā by Ithamar Theodor - I am excited to share with you this exciting news! I am teaching a writing seminar on the Bhagavad Gītā at Cornell this semester and this is truly what we ...
- Consciousness between Science and Philosophy (response to Philip Goff on panpsychism) - tl;dr Panpsychism = All is psyche, which is to say human consciousness and visible Nature take place within the World-Soul. Most moderns have accepted as a...
- Kathāmukhalambaka - 10 - Vatsarāja captured - Udayana started reigning over the kingdom which he inherited from his father on a prosperous note. However, he gradually handed it over to Yaugandharāyaṇ...
- An Integral Spiritual Approach to Development – Concept and Practice – M. S. Srinivasan - (A review of the book, Integral Rural Development: A Rural Transformation Experiment, by Sri Aurobindo Society, Puducherry by G. Palanithurai … An Integral...
- Chalukya Temple Trail – Pattadakal 1 - Photos by Suhas Mehra, text by Beloo and Suhas Mehra “…everyone who has at all the Indian spirit and feeling, can at least give some account of the main, t...
- The need for subjectivity - I first read Quentin Meillassoux in a local reading group in summer 2016, and thought at first that I was … Continue reading →
- Of Ram and Ramlīla - “It is a singular and as yet unexplained phenomenon in the psychology of mankind that out of so many magnificent civilisations, so many powerful, cultured ...
- Suprabha Nahar: In Memoriam by Anurag Banerjee - Dear Friends, With the passing away of Suprabha Nahar on 7 October 2020 at 2.45 p.m. at the age of ninety, not only has the Aurobindonian community of Pond...
- Kim Stanley Robinson, THE MINISTRY FOR THE FUTURE - I have just finished reading Kim Stanley Robinson’s new novel, The Ministry for the Future. It is one of Robinson’s best books. It is a near-future novel, ...
- Soumitra Chatterjee, a great actor - When I read that legendary actor Soumitra Chatterjee had been hospitalised after testing positive for the Corona virus I was really worried. He is 85 years...
- Platon: Sophistes - Martin Heidegger *Platon: Sophistes* GA 19 Table of Contents
- Reciting SAVITRI is an Evolutionary act - Savitri Era Party has boldly provided an intellectual alternative for the last fifteen years and many have benefited even by opposing. The Mother & Sri ...
- Reading the Qur’an: An update - This spring, I did a series of posts on my course “Reading the Qur’an,” in which we studied the full text of the Qur’an, roughly in chronological order of ...
- The Greeks of antiquity did not like to learn foreign languages - The image of India in classical antiquity remains largely a mirror of Hellenic self-affirmation, self-exploration and self-questioning. In its very opennes...
- On Chinese Wisdom - This compilation is inspired by and offered to Sri Aurobindo and The Mother who guide us by their Presence and example. It serves as a reference material...
- The Material Image that the Body Is - Many of you who read my articles on this Research Blog have never met me physically, in Auroville or elsewhere, and couldn’t find here anything but one or ...
- The bell on the dancer's anklet / Siri siri muvva - These are the translated lyrics of the song "Śivapūjaku chigurinchina sirisirimuvvā" from the Telugu film "Swarṇakamalam" (Golden Lotus). Alternative st...
- India’s handling of the Corona crisis is the best in the World - COVID-19: Is India testing enough? Myth vs Truth There is a lot of cry in the media, specially the western
- A World is Ending - My article on the pandemic in the journal Identities can be found here.
- Distorting Sri Aurobindo’s Yoga – Anirjeet - Peter Heehs and his American supporters at the Archives of Sri Aurobindo Ashram, Pondicherry, should be packed off to Donald Trump’s country and made to fe...
- Monthly updates and newsletter articles - From Jan 2019 we will not be updating this blog. Please refer to our website at https://sriaurobindosociety.org.sg/ For newsletters and articles, please r...
- Non-essence of Mirambika - What has befallen the world? Those who utter MC, BC to punctuate their speech nonsense now beseech Hot Pants to preserve Mirambika’s Essence! And she a fum...
- Savitri: A Legend and a Symbol—Urdu Translation By Satpal.: The Book of the Traveller of the Worls, The Descent into Night ,رات کے اندر نزول , Canto VII , II:vii Section 4, [58.01-58.10]- ،اِک زیادہ تاریکی تھی منتظر، اِک حکمرانی بدتر इक ज़्यादा तारीकी थी मुंतज़िर,इक हुक्मरानी बदतर, A greater darkness waited, a worse reign,
- Pronouns in Savitri: 172: Pronouns in Sentences 30.1-30.6 - (Note: The personal and "who" pronouns within Savitri lines are marked in bold and the possessive pronouns are marked in bold and italics. The square brack...
- Sightings from the Symbol Dawn: 01: Does Savitri, the ambassadress twixt eternity and change, consult Astrology? - Savitri is the ambassadress twixt eternity and change who comes down, descends on earth, in the following passage from the opening section:Almost that day ...
- National Education: 78: Subjects for general grounding of children - Classification by subject is important when one wants to study one or several subjects in depth, once an overall grounding that is useful for everyone has ...
Wednesday, September 23, 2020
Voltaire jolted me through his satire
Monday, September 14, 2020
Śaṅkara never refers to any experiences of his own
And while Śaṅkara was perhaps nondualism's purest and most famous exponent, it was taken up by many others in various ways – including by very different enemies of Śaṅkara. The later theistic thinker Rāmānuja wanted to assert against Śaṅkara that the plurality of things in the world is real, and yet he accepted Śaṅkara's basic nondualism: his philosophical system was called Viśiṣṭādvaita, differentiated or qualified nondualism. He aimed to produce a harmonious synthesis: the plurality of the world is not an illusion, as Śaṅkara would have it, but the parts of the divine One.
Now while Rāmānuja could be harshly critical of Śaṅkara himself, he remained in Śaṅkara's basic camp of loyalty to the Vedas and especially the Upaniṣads. Śaṅkara had much greater hostility to the Buddhists, who rejected the entirety of the Vedas and Upaniṣads. And yet – here is the striking thing – a very large number of Buddhists themselves accepted nondualism. The Yogācāra school had been taking up some form of nondualism since before Śaṅkara's time, enough that to other Vedāntic thinkers Śaṅkara's school just looked like the Buddhism they were familiar with; for that reason they even called him a "crypto-Buddhist" (pracchanna bauddha).
But it is crucial that most of the thinkers I've named here do not cite experience as the ground of their claims. Wilhelm Halbfass in India and Europe reminds us that Śaṅkara never refers to any experiences of his own; Chinese nondualists like Zhiyi didn't either, according to John McRae and Robert Sharf. But if anything, I think that nondualism's non-experiential provenance gives it more plausibility. That is, nondualism's exponents did not merely see it in an altered state of consciousness, but viewed it as somehow a logical necessity.
CHAPTER TWO NEO-VEDANTA: SOME CONCEPTUAL ISSUES IN THE CONTEXTS
Divine and Divine-Human Speeches of the Devi: The Speech Contexts and the Dynamics of Authority in the Devi Gitas
Two “Devis”, Two “Gurus” Speaking with Authority: Sarada Devi and Anandamayi Ma
Modifying Masculinity: Tantric Culture, Female Speech and Reframed Masculinities
[PDF] A GLOBAL HISTORY OF THE 'MULTIPLE RENAISSANCES'
[PDF] Ken Wilber's Problematic Relationship to Science
[HTML] Gandhi on Caturvarṇa and Niṣkāma Karma: A Re-interpretation
Cosmos and Consciousness: The Metaphysical Alternatives
Matter, Life and Mind: Setting the Boundaries of the Mind in Advaita Vedanta
'Passive Resistance'in India, 1905–09
[PDF] Exploring the Horizons of Change: A Study of Baby Kamble's The Prisons We Broke
Monday, August 31, 2020
What led to ten centuries of decline
Monday, August 17, 2020
Eric Weiss was an integral philosopher of Whitehead and Sri Aurobindo
Tuesday, August 11, 2020
Probabilistic this-world karma
What Lele does is to invent a new concept. He deletes the idea that karma operates across former and future lives. This immediately raises the problem of how karma can possibly work, given that many people act in good ways and experience bad results, and act in bad ways and experience
good results. Lele’s answer is that karma works probabilistically: good actions are more likely to produce experienced good results in this life, and bad actions are more likely to produce bad experienced results in this life. Karma is “probabilistic this-world karma.”
I’d call this shwarma, not karma.
If Lele were to say something like this, I’d have no objection (at least not yet). This is what philosophers do, in contrast to historians and philologists. He’d be owning up to cherry picking, and so wouldn’t be trying to have his cake and eat it too
(to mix metaphors). He’d be thinking as a Buddhist and as a cosmopolitanist (in
the philosophical sense of cosmopolitanism I advocate in Why I Am Not a
Buddhist). I’d say, “I sympathize with your situation, more power to you,
let’s see what you can do, and let’s see how others inside and outside the tradition respond.” For me, the proof would be in the pudding (to add another metaphor).
In the case at
hand, the pudding is “probabilistic this-world karma.” This is the conceptual
engineering we’re being offered. I don’t think it works.
“Probabilistic”
properly speaking applies to a scientific causal model. When we have a causal
model consisting of a set of variables, we can define a probability measure
over propositions about the variables and their values. But what is the model
in the case of eudaimonistic karma? What are the variables and parameters? Unless
we can specify these, we don’t really know what we’re talking about. Are we supposed
to use game theory and decision theory to answer these questions? But these
theories typically abstract away from individual moral virtue, which is the key
concept of eudaimonistic thought. These theories and the concept of karma don’t
seem to fit together very well.
I worry that we’re
dealing with the same kind of scientism that infects much of Buddhist
modernism. By “scientism” I mean using scientific concepts where they’re not
appropriate. “Eudaimonistic karma” is a normative concept. It refers to good
and bad individual mental intentions and actions. Normative concepts operate in
the logical space of reasons—the logical space of being able to justify what
you say in relation to norms and values. The concept of probability, however,
is a descriptive one that operates in the logical space of causes. When you say
“probabilistic karma” you just code switch between the normative and
descriptive languages without helping us to think about their relation.
There are other
problems. As I wrote before, ...
Evan Thompson
Seth Zuiho Segall said: