Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra
A Philosophy of Evolution for the Contemporary Man
Bergson pointed out that the molluscs in the order of evolution proceed by steady steps to develop an eye, which resembles very much the eye developed by the independent line of vertebrates. How does it happen, he asked, that similar effects appear in different lines of evolution brought about by different means? How could the same small variations occur in two independent lines of evolution if they were purely accidental? According to Bergson, the two series must have been governed by a common vital impulse to this useful end. There is something more in evolution than merely mechanical urge. He is inclined to attribute a ‘rudiment of choice’ to the species which, travelling by different paths, reach the same goal. Given a new situation, the ‘urge’ (elan vital), common to all members, leads them to meet it by a new method. According to Bergson, it is the inner urge, or life force, or an upward drive, that incites the whole species in a definite direction. The striving of the organism is the creative effort to which evolution is due.
The biological theory of evolution assumes that life always came from life. Herbert Spencer questioned this assumption and attempted to give a philosophical account of the rise of the living from the non-living, the mental from the non-mental. According to him, the differences between these are due to the degree of the complexity of the organization. But still the question why life should evolve out of Matter or in Matter is not explained. Why should life occur at all? The theory of the survival of the fittest does not carry us far. Life has little survival value as compared with matter from which it is supposed to have sprung. A rock survives for hundreds of millions of years, while even the oldest tree is only a few thousand years old. If survival was the aim of nature, life would never have appeared...
Alexander’s philosophy is called the philosophy of emergent evolution. According to him, when physical structure assumes a certain complexity, life ‘emerges’ as something new. When the physical structure alters in complexity, as it does when it produces a central nervous system, mind emerges, and the gap between life and conscious behaviour is supposed to be covered. Alexander finds the explanation in a nisus or thirst of the universe for higher levels. It is the nisus that is creative, that satisfies the thirst.
But is nisus an unconscious drive coming by degrees to consciousness in man? Unless we assume the nisus to be a spiritual power ever drawing on its resources and ever expressing new forms, Alexander’s whole account becomes unsatisfactory.
Lloyd Morgan, who comes very close to Alexander in his account of emergent evolution, acknowledges God as the nisus through whose Activity emergents emerge, and the whole course of emergent evolution is directed. According to him, God is not the emergent deity, but an Activity within which qualities emerge. God is the breath of the whole movement, the deep root which feeds the whole tree. The course of history is the gradual coming of God to Himself. Lloyd Morgan contends that emergent evolution is not predictable. But it is not in the strict sense undetermined like Bergson’s creative evolution, not only unpredictable for human minds but, in principle, for all minds. Lloyd Morgan infers the coming of divinity from the purposeful direction of the universe, and he is inclined to make his God completely immanent. He maintains that the whole course of events subsumed under evolution is the expression of God’s purpose.
Lloyd Morgan is basically an adherent of Spinoza, and although he speaks of ‘emergence’ in the evolutionary process, one suspects that changes occur according to rule, and there is no spontaneity...
‘Ingressive evolution’ is a phrase that aptly describes Whitehead’s theory. There is, according to Whitehead, a progressive ingression and incorporation into the cosmic series of the eternal order which God embraces in himself. The ‘primordial’ nature of God is the conceptual consciousness of the possibilities capable of harmonious concurrent realization. These possibilities are called by Whitehead ‘eternal objects’. They are eternal forms or ideas, to use the Platonic expression, but unlike Plato’s ideas, they are not substances, but possibilities, conceptually realized in God. They are not imaginary or abstract. Some of them are apprehended as possibilities logically prior to their manifestation in existence, and others as symbols of values that we pursue. The relation of form to the temporal world is that of potentialities to actualities. In the view of Whitehead, the temporary actualities realize the possibilities surveyed in God’s nature. The order and purpose we see in the world is the result of actuality fulfilling the highest possibilities it sees before itself, which is the vision of God as relevant for it. - Kireet Joshi
Sri Aurobindo acknowledges that all does not have to be fundamentally changed; on the contrary, all that is still needed in the totality has to be preserved, but all has to be perfected. ‘The human body has’, says Sri Aurobindo, ‘in it parts and instruments that have been sufficiently evolved to serve the divine life; these have to survive in their form, though they must be still farther perfected, their limitation of range and use removed, their liability to defect and malady and impairment eliminated, their capacities to cognition and dynamic action carried beyond the present limits ‘ On the other hand, new powers have also to be acquired by the body which our present humanity could not hope to realize, could not even dream of or could only imagine. - Kireet Joshi
Being caught talking to yourself can feel embarrassing, but decades of research shows that most of us engage in some form of self-talk every day. Digging into the science, this animation explores self-talk in its many manifestations and outlines how it can be beneficial buff.ly/aqyKPZU
https://bsky.app/profile/aeon.co/post/3msxgso33oo23
We should all nod quietly to the existential lie that all cultures are equal whilst recognizing apparently that all cultures are indeed superior to the West. No! The West in general and the United States in particular are unique civilizations. Historically speaking, people did not have the right to criticize their rulers. They did not have the right to practice any religion or no religion. They did not have the right to pursue life, liberty, and happiness as codified in the Declaration of Independence. The fabric of a nation and its greatness is not defined by the majesty of its shoreline or its mountain ranges. What makes a nation great, or not, are the organizing principles that define that society.
https://x.com/i/status/2087518255204208889
FLAVORS OF ADVAITA IN VIVEKANANDA, RABINDRANATH, AND SRI AUROBINDO
connected to the Brahmo Samaj, though he did not think of himself as a Brahmo—his
mother was a daughter of Rajnarain Bose, one of the important stalwarts of the …
The Origin of Indian Nationalism: Mazzini's Influence on Savarkar, Gandhi and other Freedom Fighters
the Italian revolutionary nationalist, on Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, a central and
contested figure in the articulation of Hindutva and militant Indian nationalism …
Humanism in Cinema: The Work of Satyajit Ray
Certain parallels may be observed in the works of Tagore and Ray, in portraying the
restless reformism of the Bengal Renaissance. It was Tagore’s concept of India that …
[PDF] Politics of Control in Orwell's 1984: Education, Surveillance, and Authoritarian Legitimacy in South Asia
ideology reshape historical narratives, and in Pakistan, where online propaganda
and surveillance mirror the Party’s slogan,“Big Brother is watching you.” The …
[PDF] Personal Peace Practices, Skills, and Competencies
often share core embodied traits, characteristics, and behaviors that support their
efficacy in promoting peace and resolving conflict among communities and structures …
[PDF] Fostering Hope through Peace Leadership: A Reflective Review of the Field
beacon of hope needed in a world riddled with conflict and divisiveness. Exploring
over 60 pieces of peace leadership literature, this review highlights the skills …
[HTML] Contemporary Issues in Bioethics
social, philosophical, and legal issues arising in life sciences, medicine, technology,
nonhuman biological environment, and public policy. 1 It mainly focuses on the …
Redefining spiritual leadership: the growing role of women
the analysis of past and present. It also highlights the critique of patriarchal spiritual
structures and the tension between spiritual equality and institutional exclusion with …
CHARITY FOR OUR FAMILY GODDESS:: The Marwaris And A Caste Association In Colonial India
study for historical analysis on how an Indian merchant community, known as
Marwaris, described themselves through managing a caste association and …
[PDF] Provincialising English”: Northeast India as an Ethnopolitan Space
emerge in African languages. However, in the late 1980s, African literature in
English emerged as a new canon. Even the debate between Ngugi wa Thiong’o and …
Selected Speeches, Writings and Statements
my keen disappointment at the selection of the speaker on this subject. 1 I would
have expected the persons who had recently come out with suggestions of …