Record of Yoga provides unique insights into the experiential foundations of Sri Aurobindo's philosophy

 The Record of Yoga matters less in the overall examination of Sri Aurobindo's public legacy primarily because it is a private, technical diary of his personal spiritual experiments, rather than a systematic, public exposition of his philosophy and teachings meant for a general audience. 

Here are the key reasons why his major published works like The Life Divine, The Synthesis of Yoga, and Savitri take precedence in his legacy:

• Intended Audience: Major works were written for the public, primarily serialized in the philosophical review Arya, to articulate his comprehensive worldview and the principles of Integral Yoga to the world. The Record of Yoga was his private diary ("record of sadhana") and uses highly personal, abbreviated, and Sanskrit-hybridized terminology that is difficult for a general reader to understand without extensive editorial guidance.
• Philosophical Scope: Works like The Life Divine provide a vast, integrated philosophical framework for conscious evolution and the "divine life on earth," addressing universal human concerns and integrating Eastern and Western thought. The Record, while providing a unique insight into the experiential foundations of his philosophy, is a day-to-day log focused on the minutiae of his personal struggles and progress in the yoga, making it more of a supplementary text for serious scholars and advanced practitioners.
• Accessibility and Cohesion: Published works are carefully structured and present a coherent, polished intellectual legacy that influenced fields from psychology to political theory. The Record, being a diary, is unstructured and was not published in book form until 2001, long after his other works had established his global reputation and intellectual contribution.
• Focus on the Goal vs. the Process: Sri Aurobindo's legacy is defined by his ultimate vision of the supramental transformation of earthly life. His major works detail this ultimate aim and the method for achieving it. The Record, in contrast, details the difficult, day-to-day struggles and processes, including encounters with "hostile and anti-divine experiences," which, while valuable for understanding the difficulty of the path, are less central to the message and goal of his work.
• The Mother's Role: After 1926, the Mother took over the guidance of disciples, and Sri Aurobindo went into seclusion to focus on the subtler, inner work, which he continued to document in the Record. His extensive correspondence with disciples during this later period, collected in works like Letters on Yoga, provides the practical, accessible guidance that forms a larger part of his active teaching legacy than the private diary. 

In essence, while the Record of Yoga offers a unique, intimate look into the "laboratory" of his spiritual experimentation, his major philosophical and literary works are the carefully crafted vehicles through which he transmitted his vision to humanity. - GoogleAI

[PDF] Buoyant Life: Floating Urbanities Adrift in the Archipelagic Imaginary

R Siriwardane-de Zoysa, MSC Gemilang - Engaging Science, Technology, and …, 2025

Against ecologically modernist calls for the building of floating cities in the name of climate-proofing littoral futures, and this work critically engages with travelling technopolitical dreams for building with or on water in rapidly submerging coastal …

Ecovillages and energy in the Global South

AK Venkitaraman - Sustainable Urban Environments for Human Health, 2026

Rapid urbanization in the Global South paves a way for employment opportunities but on the other hand, urbanization, if uncontrolled, can lead to a variety of challenges and ecological hazards. These hazards are induced by humans and to …

[PDF] “America First” Reimagined: Trump's Nationalism and the Unravelling of the Liberal International Order

SJ Ghalib - Pakistan Journal of American Studies, 2025

… The Hindutva ideology directly threatens minorities in the state, particularly those in Kashmir (“Hindutva Through the Prism of Hinduism,” nd). It … With Prime Minister Narendra Modi coming to power in 2014, Hindutva has turned into a worldwide …

[PDF] Role of Civilizational Populism in Shaping Religious Othering: A Comparative Analysis of India and Pakistan

S Asrar, SM Falki - Journal of Politics and International Studies, 2025

… (Yilmaz & Saleem, Hindutva civilizational populist BJP's enforcement of digital authoritarianism in India, 2022) In their article present a compelling analysis of how the rise of Hindutva-driven civilizational populism under Narendra Modi’s leadership …

Book review: Meera Nanda, Postcolonial Theory and the Making of Hindu Nationalism: The Wages of Unreason

NJ Thomas - 2025

… Nanda, in this book, declares in very stark terms that the post-colonial left and the Hindutva right have been ‘strange bedfellows’ (p. 1) and examines the inadvertent, although not inculpable, role of the former in an intellectual scaffolding to the latter …

Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra 

Transgression of limits as fundamental to human condition

 Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra

Yes, Kierkegaard and Ricoeur can be compared with Berkeley, but primarily as points of philosophical contrast rather than similarity. While Kierkegaard and Ricoeur are associated with existentialism and phenomenology's focus on the individual subject and lived experience, Berkeley's idealism is fundamentally different, asserting that reality is only perceived as ideas in a mind. The comparison hinges on their divergent views of the self, reality, and the relationship between them. 

Kierkegaard vs. Berkeley

• Kierkegaard: An existentialist, he emphasized the individual's subjective experience, freedom, and responsibility in creating meaning, particularly through "leap of faith" and ethical choices.
• Berkeley: An idealist, he argued that objects only exist insofar as they are perceived ("esse est percipi") and are sustained by a divine mind.
• Comparison: The key difference is that Kierkegaard's philosophy is rooted in the lived, often paradoxical, experience of the individual, while Berkeley's is based on the nature of perception and the existence of a divine observer. 

Ricoeur vs. Berkeley

• Ricoeur: A phenomenologist and hermeneutic philosopher, he explored the self through narrative identity and the interpretation of texts and lived experiences. He focused on a "capable self" that develops through interactions with the world and others.
• Berkeley: As noted above, Berkeley's idealism is a theory of perception and existence, not a philosophy of selfhood or interpretation in the same way as Ricoeur's work.
• Comparison: Ricoeur's focus is on the dynamic, narrative construction of the self, while Berkeley's is on the fundamental nature of reality and existence itself. 

How to compare them

• Point of contrast: The most significant point of comparison is that Kierkegaard and Ricoeur focus on the self, identity, and meaning from a subjective, existential, and narrative standpoint, whereas Berkeley's philosophy is concerned with the objective reality of the world and is founded on the idea that it is all "in the mind".
• Metaphysical vs. phenomenological: Berkeley's idealism is a metaphysical position about the nature of reality, while Kierkegaard's existentialism and Ricoeur's phenomenology are primarily concerned with the human experience and understanding of reality.
• The role of the self: For Kierkegaard and Ricoeur, the self is an active agent that creates its own meaning and identity. For Berkeley, the self is a percipient, and the existence of a distinct, individual "self" is secondary to God's perception of ideas. 

- GoogleAI 

https://www.google.com/search?q=Can+Kierkegaard+and+Paul+Ricouer+be+compared+with+Berkeley+&client

Vico, Hamann, and Bataille can be compared by their shared emphasis on the role of

myth and symbol in human understanding, though their ultimate aims differed: Vico and Hamann focused on human creation and history through language, while Bataille explored the transgressive, often violent, aspects of human experience. All three critiqued Enlightenment rationalism by highlighting the limitations of abstract, detached knowledge in favor of the messy, symbolic reality of human existence. 

Shared critiques of Enlightenment rationalism 

• Critique of pure reason: All three philosophers were critical of the Enlightenment emphasis on clear, distinct, and abstract rational knowledge, which they saw as inadequate for understanding the human world.
• Importance of myth and symbol: They all recognized that human understanding is not purely rational but is shaped by language, myth, and symbol.
• Turn to the human and the historical: Vico, Hamann, and Bataille all turned away from the study of nature to focus on the human world of culture, history, and the social, though they approached this in different ways. 

Vico and Hamann: The creation of meaning 

• Vico: Focused on how humans create their own history and social world through what he called "maker's knowledge" (
  

  $\text{verum et factum}$
  ), which is rooted in language and communication. He saw history as the product of shared cultural practices and the evolution of language.
• Hamann: Argued that thought itself is inextricably linked to language and that there are no "pure" or "clear and distinct" ideas that can exist apart from a symbolic medium. He saw language as a creative, not a transparent, medium for understanding the world. 

Bataille: Transgression and excess 

• Bataille: Shared a similar starting point to Vico and Hamann in critiquing rationalism but focused on the human experiences that lie beyond rational control.
• Focus on the "abject": He explored the darker, more transgressive aspects of human experience—such as violence, death, and sacrifice—that are often suppressed by rational systems.
• Critique of utility: Bataille believed that human existence is not solely about production and utility but also involves a "non-productive" expenditure of energy and a "sovereign" experience of excess and loss that defies rational analysis. 

How they differ 

• The purpose of the analysis: Vico and Hamann were focused on building a science of culture based on how humans create meaning, while Bataille was more interested in the breakdown of those systems through the exploration of what lies beyond them.
• Role of violence: While Vico saw violence as a part of the historical cycles of civilization, Bataille saw violence and the transgression of limits as a fundamental part of the human condition itself.
• Ultimate value: Vico and Hamann saw meaning-making as the fundamental human activity, whereas Bataille saw the "non-productive" expenditure of excess as a potentially more fundamental aspect of being human. 

- GoogleAI 

https://www.google.com/search?q=How+Vico+and+Hamann+can+be+compared+to+Bataille&client