When we have passed beyond knowings, then we shall have knowledge. Reason was the helper, Reason is the bar.
Monday, November 26, 2007
To speak is to repeat
The rejection of Darwinism is not a uniquely American Christian phenomenon
Sunday, November 25, 2007
Science and the humanities from nonmaterialistic perspectives
Marx anticipates Baudrillard’s critique
Baudrillard argues in particular that the real in Lacan is always already imaginary
"Capitalism doesn't care who produces what...instead all it cares about is that it is constantly producing stuff, because in the end capitalism is about consumption, not production...Baudrillard argues that really Marx's theories are the 'mirror of production' and are a good rhetorical balancing act that actually helped support capitalism rather than subvert or oppose it"I found this to be very Derridaian (I made this word up, but you get what I mean) because Baudrillard is deconstructing the idea of Marxism and exposing its flaws. But enough with the Marxism, lets get on to some of Baudrillard's other ideas. I must say that the cow/hay/money example Ken gave to explain the three basic orders really helped me to understand this concept. After class on Tuesday I was a bit confused so I went back and reread this section, and it makes much more sense. However, I guess Baudrillard is still somewhat hard for me to grasp. Ken explains that Baudrillard felt that theorists - many of which we have studied in class - are not actually discovering anything.
"The point is that everyone keeps producing these systems of production, proliferating signs and truths and concepts, and yet doing so with the pretense of discovering what they are actually inventing."I am having trouble understanding this concept. I think it means that theorists do not actually discover anything; the example he gave was of Lacan and psychoanalysis. Ken explains that Lacan and Freud claim to have discovered the unconscious and can find true meaning from analyzing the unconscious. Baudrillard believes that these meanings and forms of analysis are invented. I think this relates to the simulacra; Ken gave the example of the ET ride at universal studios which is also similar to how we discussed Disney World in class. Ken explains that although the ET ride and Disney World appear to be simulations, they are
"so fake that they aren't actually copying anything, they're just making stuff up and telling you it's the real thing."Maybe these two concepts do not relate, but to me it seems like the notion that theorists believe to be 'discovering' something but really are just inventing an idea and the concept of simulacra are some what similar. I am having trouble articulating what is going on in my head right now, so I will leave this idea here for now and if someone helps me out, or I make better sense of it tonight while I am lying in bed, I will be sure to post again. One last concept I will try to discuss is Baudrillard's hyperreal, which I believe is what the movie the Matrix tried to do. So the hyperreal is when there is so much simulation, that a person considers their life and their experiences through the these simulations, creating a reality that essentially is not reality. Ken gives the example of going to a national park and trying to find a spot where a famous picture was taken, so you can try to take the same picture.
"...even if you go off to wherever you're going to see if the simulation you saw of it previously was really accurate, you're already relating to the real through the referential lens of the simulation. So the real you discover will always be an effect of the simulation, a copy or non-copy of it."I am somewhat perplexed by this, because I read earlier that Bauldrillard had a problem with psychoanalysis and Lacan. This concept of the hyperreal seems me, to be very similar to Lacan's notion of the real. Lacan believes that the real can never be achieved and it seems like Baudrillard feels the same way; if simulation is so pervasive in our lives, then we must be living completely unaware that this is not true reality. I know there must be a difference between these two ideas, I am just not finding it right now. I think that all of Baudrillard's ideas that I have been introduced to so far are very interesting, however as our good friend Chaz Michael Michaels says, all of this is pretty mind-bottling. I am going to watch the Matrix tonight with Nick Adams, and hopefully the two of us can make sense of Baudrillard and talk this one out. Be expecting another post some time before next week :) Posted by Bunbury at 11:47 AM
1 comments: Ken said...I'll keep an eye out for a follow-up post, but let me say two quick things. First, regarding Baudrillard and Lacan, it's pretty complicated. Most of the debate takes place in a book called Symbolic Exchange and Death, where Baudrillard argues in particular that the real in Lacan is always already imaginary. He has some substantive claims for why this is the case, and I actually wrote an essay about the Matrix where I do a sort of Derridean read of Lacan's mirror stage lecture to show why Baudrillard was pretty spot on, but the arguments are pretty specific. I can send a copy of the essay along if you like. But the more pertinent point is that Baudrillard's real is indeed quite similar, but it's also more generalized, and it doesn't rely on a psychic economy that keeps the Imaginary, Symbolic, and Real separate. October 31, 2007 5:01 PM Kenneth Rufo Schmitt and the Temporality of the Political
Thursday, November 22, 2007
Nancy’s essay, “The Judeo-Christian: On Faith,” treats a text neglected by philosophers and theologians alike: the Epistle of James
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Deleuze’s thought cannot be reduced either to a ‘phenomenology’ or to Badiou’s polemical opposite
COLLAPSE Volume III ‘Unknown Deleuze’ Posted by Farhang Erfani on November 15th, 2007 Purchase/subscribe online Readers can also download a preview of the Editorial Introduction to Volume III from, where introductions to Vols I and II are also available.
Whilst books continue to appear at an alarming rate which claim to put Deleuze’s thought ‘to work’ in diverse areas outside of philosophy, we submit, in this volume, that his philosophical thought itself still remains enigmatic, both in its detail and in its major themes. The contributors to this volume aim to clarify, from a variety of perspectives, Deleuze’s contribution to philosophy: in what does his philosophical originality lie; what does he appropriate from other philosophers and how does he transform it? And how can the apparently disparate threads of his work to be ‘integrated’ – what is the precise nature of the constellation of the aesthetic, the conceptual and the political proposed by Gilles Deleuze, and what are the overarching problems in which the numerous philosophical concepts ’signed Deleuze’ converge?
The volume includes two newly-translated articles by Gilles Deleuze along with contributions from Arnaud Villani, Thomas Duzer, Quentin Meillassoux, John Sellars, Éric Alliez & Jean-Claude Bonne, Haswell & Hecker, Robin Mackay, Mehrdad Iravanian, J.-H. Rosny the Elder, Graham Harman, Iain Hamilton Grant and Ray Brassier.
For anyone wanting to go right to the core of Deleuzian philosophy and to experience the challenge of Deleuze’s thought, the articles collected in Collapse III will provide a virtually inexhaustible treasury of insights. As the featured authors shed light on this challenge from different points of view, they produce unexpected points of convergence, providing important resources for a more complete conceptual ‘portrait’ of Deleuze, and suggesting further lines of thought to be investigated. For anyone looking for an alternative to the emerging orthodoxy seemingly bent on broadcasting an ‘image of Deleuzian thought’, Collapse III provides a wide-ranging but uniformly rigorous and innovative survey of Gilles Deleuze’s thought, and an illustration of the fact that, even if it is already fashionable to evoke a ‘post-Deleuzian’ era, we have not yet begun to draw the properly philosophical consequences of this thought. – Mathesis, Science and Philosophy, written by a 21-year-old Gilles Deleuze, has never before appeared in print in English and is published in Collapse in a new translation. Written as an introduction to a 1946 republication of a 19th-century esoteric philosophical work by Dr Johann Malfatti de Montereggio, this text offers a fascinating glimpse, set in an unexpected context, into the themes of Deleuze’s early work, as they emerge, in an already characteristically-dazzling style. Meanwhile, in the brief but illuminating 1981 interview with Arnaud Villani, Answers to a Series of Questions (also appearing here for the first time in English), Deleuze provides some tantalising intimations regarding the enduring concerns of his work over the years.– In his own contribution to the volume, philosopher-poet Arnaud Villani (whose 1999 The Wasp and the Orchid was one of the first books to be published in France treating Deleuze’s work as a whole) reflects on Deleuze’s affirmation that he considered himself a ‘pure metaphysician’: what, precisely, does metaphysics mean for Deleuze? Through a sophisticated reading utilising the resources of aesthetics, poetics and philosophy, Villani not only defines the object of this metaphysics, but also shows clearly why it cannot be severed from its links with these other realms of thought, or from the question of the political or moral ‘decision’.
– This allusion reminds us that an examination of Deleuze today would be unthinkable without reference to Alain Badiou’s provocative Deleuze: The Clamor of Being, and in his article In Memoriam of Deleuze, Thomas Duzer undertakes, through a survey of the major axes of Deleuze’s philosophy, to locate the precise nature of their now famous ‘nonrelationship’; his defence emphasises that the positive features of Deleuze’s thought cannot be reduced either to a ‘phenomenology’ or to Badiou’s polemical opposite.
– In an exclusive translated extract from their new book Matisse-Thought: Portrait of the Artist as Hyperfauve, philosopher Éric Alliez (former student of Deleuze’s and author of The Signature of the World) and art-historian Jean-Claude Bonne analyse the revolution inaugurated in painting by Matisse during his ‘Fauvist’ period of 1905-6, discovering that the rigorous ‘quantitative’ conception of the intensive which Matisse proposes allows not only a new understanding of the significance of Fauvism for his later work, but also clarifies and reaffirms the philosophical pertinence of a Nietzschean-Deleuzian thinking of intensity and extensity, the qualitative and the quantitative. – On the basis of an examination of a ‘fragment’ from Deleuze and Guattari’s What is Philosophy?, Quentin Meillassoux, in a philosophical tour de force, meticulously reconstructs the nature and the measure of Deleuzian ‘immanence’, proposing finally a ’subtractive’ reading drawing on Bergson’s Matter and Memory, allowing us to understand, step-by-step ‘from the inside’ the construction of that singular network of concepts found in Deleuze’s work.
– Sound artists Russell Haswell and Florian Hecker contribute some strange and beautiful images taken from the electronic ’score’ of their new sound work Blackest Ever Black, an ‘introduction to synaesthesia’ created using composer Iannis Xenakis’s computerised UPIC system to transform contemporary images into sound. An accompanying text by Robin Mackay analyses the affinities between Xenakis’s conception of a musical ‘polyagogy’ and Deleuze’s ‘transcendental empiricism’.
– Examining Deleuze’s famous use of the supposedly Stoic theory of Chronos and Aîon in Logic of Sense, John Sellars (author of The Stoics and The Art of Living) examines just how much it owes to actual stoic theories of time, thus providing both a case-study in the Deleuzian ‘ventriloquism’ in the history of philosophy and an informative example of the ’stratigraphic’ time in which, according to Deleuze, philosophy takes place.
– Iranian architect Mehrdad Iravanian constructs a ‘graphitext’ which, taking as its starting point a page from Deleuze’s The Fold, undertakes a non-interpretative ‘ex-pli-cation’ of its content. Employing a hybrid methodology at once literal, textual and architectural, he brings to light structures secreted within the folds of the text itself.
– One of the many obscure ‘personae’ in the background of Deleuze’s Difference and Repetition, the mysterious figure J.-H. Rosny the Elder not only supplied that work’s repeated formula for the nature of intensity-as-difference, but, as both philosopher and pioneering science fiction author, was also a living embodiment of the notion that ‘philosophy is a kind of science-fiction’: in his astonishing 1895 tale Another World, appearing here in English for the very first time, Rosny evokes an alien world of abstract lifeforms intersecting with our own, and examines with philosophical acuity the process of bringing such unknown beings within the purview of scientific knowledge.
– As if all this were not enough … Following the ‘dossier’ on Speculative Realism in the previous volume of Collapse, Volume III also includes a full transcription of the colloquium of the same name held at Goldsmith’s University of London in April 2007 featuring presentations by Ray Brassier, Iain Hamilton Grant, Graham Harman and Quentin Meillassoux on the problems, and the promise, of this renewal of speculative philosophical thought. Running to well over 100 pages, this is an important and exciting document of contemporary philosophy in the making, proposing new conceptual approaches, exploring the borders between science and philosophy, and mining the history of thought for fresh insights into Nature, objectivity, and the legacy of ‘correlationism’. Online orders for Volume III are priced (including postage) £10 (UK) / £13 (Europe) / £16 (Elsewhere).
Philosophy can’t stay in its ivory tower. It provides a weapon against dogma and manipulation
UNESCO.org /Services / Courier Themes Education Natural Sciences Social & Human Sciences Culture Communication & Information Special Themes Worldwide Africa Arab States Asia and the Pacific Europe and North America Latin America and the Caribbean Communities Member States Permanent Delegations National Commissions Ministries National Institutions Parliamentarians Cities and Local Authorities United Nations System Intergovernmental Organizations Non-Governmental Organizations Private Sector Media Specialized Networks Subscribe to the Courier Available in six languages
2007 - number 9 Philosophy : A cosmic responsibility Eight philosophers contributed to this issue of the UNESCO Courier, focusing on the role of philosophy today. Different approaches, varied concerns, but one certainty: philosophy can’t stay in its ivory tower. It provides a weapon against dogma and manipulation. And, to cite one of Jostein Gaarder’s ideas, philosophers have a cosmic responsibility. (More)
Jostein Gaarder : A user’s manual for our planet
As pollution and climate change threaten human survival on our planet, Norwegian philosopher Jostein Gaarder –the internationally celebrated author of "Sophie’s World" – argues that philosophy can help us defuse the time bomb that is ticking away. More
Michel Onfray : A philosopher of the Enlightenment
From art and politics to bioethics, religion, the internet and the odyssey of tea, French philosopher Michel Onfrey focuses on a multitude of issues that concern contemporary humanity in his numerous books and lectures. For Mr Onfray, philosophy must be effective on the existential plane. More
M. E. Orellana Benado : The humanity of humour
“There is nothing so ridiculous but some philosopher has said it,” Cicero argued. Chilean philosopher M. E. Orellana Benado for his part postulates that humour “has more to do with the diversity of ways in which we live (that is to say, with our identities), than with the way we reason and think (that is to say with our nature as human beings).” More
Peter J. King : Philosophy against manipulation
Philosophy cannot make people honest, believes British Professor Peter J. King, author of 100 Philosophers: a guide to the greatest thinkers of humanity. But it gives us the tools to defend ourselves against those who are neither benevolent nor truthful …who wish to manipulate us. More
Ioanna Kuçuradi : A Sisyphean task
The confusion prevailing in particular in political discourse makes it possible to claim “the right to offend”1 or to ascribe different meanings to the same terms: freedom of expression, laicité, terror etc. Philosophy can provide the tools against this misuse which has crucial results for practice, believes Turkish philosopher Ioanna Kuçuradi. More
Mohammed Arkoun : Philosophy and religion, between exchange and tension
“Islamizing” modernity instead of modernizing Islam – preposterous! worries Professor Mohammed Arkoun. A refuge in poor countries, a rejection of “tele-techno-scientific reasoning” in rich countries, religiosity is spreading in the world at the expense of humanist values and philosophical thinking. More
Kwasi Wiredu : Fostering intercultural understanding through dialogue
If the logical independence of morality from religion were to be generally understood, some of the ferocity of current conflicts might be reduced, says Ghanaian philosopher Kwasi Wiredu. More
Woo-Tak Kee : Towards a philosophy of universality
It is the philosopher’s task to “recover humanity” believes South-Korean philosopher Woo-Tak Kee who recommends a world philosophy for a world community. A philosophy that should play an important part in the universality within cultural diversity. More
The conception of nature that arises with modernity is something disenchanted and mechanical
Derrida names this difference that is different than difference, différance
- What if an other were other than an other?
- That is, what if alterity was already othered?
- What if alterity was other to itself?
- What if, when one tried to specify the place of alterity, of what is not here or with one in their singularity, one never could find it, because it was always in another place than this other place?
- What if, looking at Pakistan, the other of India, Indians could not find Pakistan--what if Pakistan were elsewhere? Or Israel, with respect to Palestine?
- Or "terrorism" (to duplicate the way we here raise concepts to otherness to assert superiority--one cannot point to a nation we are the other of, there are too few or too many--and in doing so only reveal an abysmal lack of understanding and respect for national otherness that exceeds every other nation's) with respect to the US?
This is what Derrida is getting at. Indeed, it perhaps implies that the other is multiple, but this is not the thrust of the question, for the multiple could only be accounted for if it were viewed as whole, as singular, that is, as other that was not also other to itself.
Monday, November 19, 2007
The material creation is born and expands from a core, a central point, like the hub of a wheel
"The greatest thing that can ever be, the most marvelous thing since the beginning of creation, the Miracle has happened... A new world, yes, a completely new world is born and here. Yet even now, there are very few people who are aware of its birth and of the difference it brings into the world."
The wide sweep of vision given by Sri Aurobindo for the future of man
by RY Deshpande on Mon 19 Nov 2007 03:18 AM PST Permanent Link
There are however questions related to the exact nature of the transition from mental to spiritual being and of the process and method of his appearance. When a spiritual being emerges in a Mind embodied in Life-in-Matter, then precisely because of that very circumstance he also gets limited by the conditions of its existence here. Whatever spiritual evolution has taken place in us so far it is as yet only a part of the mental evolution, a special operation of man’s mentality, an upward movement of the mental being. If this is all that is going to happen then the spiritual evolution cannot have an independent emergence, nor a supramental future: it cannot be called evolution of the spiritual man proper; there is at best an evolution of a finer element in a mental being. Howsoever developed it be, it is difficult for man’s mind to distinguish entirely the soul or self or any spiritual element in him. He essentially remains mental.
In man mind has become separate, he can become aware of his mental operations as distinct from his life-operations, his thought and will can disengage themselves from his sensations and impulses, desires and emotional reactions, can become detached from them, observe and control them, sanction or cancel their functioning; yet he cannot know well enough the secrets of his being. The movements of the soul in him are involved in the mind-movements; its operations are mental and emotional. But then there can be a decisive emergence in the mental being when it separates itself from thought and sees itself in an inner silence as the spirit in mind, or separates itself from the life-movements, desires, sensations, kinetic impulses, or separates itself from the body-sense. Indeed, this discovery can go farther, it can even put aside all relation to form or action of Nature. Not by mental perception and observation, but by an intrinsic consciousness and its direct sense of things and its intimate exact vision it is possible to look at Nature. In the silent being one becomes aware of the Self, of the spiritual consciousness itself. This is already a considerable evolution, a beginning of spiritual transformation.
But it is possible to go farther; the spiritual being, once inwardly liberated, can develop in mind the higher states of being that are its own natural atmosphere and bring down a supramental energy and action which are proper to the Truth-Consciousness. At first this truth of the spirit and of spirituality is not self-evident to the mind. There is vagueness, and confusion is inevitable as a temporary stage of the evolution, because ignorance is its starting-point. Spirituality is in its essence an awakening to the inner reality of our being, to a spirit, self, soul which is other than our mind, life and body; there is an inner aspiration to know, to feel, to be that; it is to enter into contact with the greater Reality beyond and pervading the universe which inhabits also our own being; to be in communion with It and union with It, and a turning, a conversion, a transformation of our whole being as a result of the aspiration, the contact, the union, a growth or waking into a new becoming or new being, a new self, a new nature—this is what spirituality means.
The task of the creative Consciousness-Force is to lead a double evolution: the evolution of our outward nature and the evolution of our inner being, our occult subliminal and spiritual nature. The evolution of mind to its greatest possible range, height, subtlety has to be the preoccupation for a long time. This is a preparation for the unveiling of an entirely intuitive intelligence, of Overmind, of Supermind, the difficult passage to a higher instrumentation of the Spirit. There are limitations and obstacles, of the mind, life and body, the heavy inertia and persistence of the body, the turbid passions of the life-part, the obscurity and doubting incertitudes, denials, and other-formulations of the mind. These can make the spiritual urge impatient, to the extent to reject the life, to mortify the body, to silence the mind and achieve its own separate salvation. If Nature refuses submission to the emerging spirit, then the soul must withdraw himself from her.
There are four main lines which Nature has followed in her attempt to open up the inner being,—religion, occultism, spiritual thought and an inner spiritual realisation and experience: the three first are approaches, the last is the decisive avenue of entry. All these four powers have sometimes worked by a simultaneous action. Each of these means or approaches corresponds to something in our total being and therefore to something necessary to the total aim of her evolution. There are four necessities of man's self-expansion. He must know himself and discover and utilise all his potentialities. This he can do only by knowing his inner mental, vital, physical and psychic being and its powers and movements and the universal laws and processes of the occult Mind and Life which stand behind the material front of the universe. He must know the hidden Power or Powers that control the world, get into some kind of accord with the master Beings of the universe. In the spiritual field all this religious, occult or philosophical knowledge and endeavour must, to bear fruition, end in an opening up of the spiritual consciousness, in experiences that found and continually heighten, expand and enrich that consciousness and in the building of a life and action that is in conformity with the truth of the spirit: this is the work of spiritual realisation and experience.
In evolution each new principle has to make its way out of an involution in Inconscience and Ignorance. It is a difficult task, of pulling itself out of the involution, out of the hold of the obscurity. The thing done has not only to be confirmed, secured against relapse and the downward gravitation, against failure and extinction, but also opened out into all the fields of its possibilities, its self-achievement, utmost height, subtlety, riches, wideness; it has to become dominant, all-embracing, comprehensive.
Evolutionary Nature in her first awakening must begin with a vague sense of the Infinite and the Invisible surrounding the physical being, a sense of the limitation and impotence of human mind and will and of something greater than himself concealed in the world. In the process would arrive the mystics with their endeavour on a power of suprarational knowledge, intuitive, inspired, revelatory and with the force of the inner being to enter into occult truth and experience.
An intellectual approach to the highest knowledge, the mind’s possession of it, is an indispensable aid to this early movement of Nature in the human being. Ordinarily, on our surface, man’s chief instrument of thought and action is the reason, the observing, understanding and arranging intellect. In any total advance or evolution of the Spirit, not only the intuition, insight, inner sense, the heart’s devotion, a deep and direct life-experience of the things of the Spirit have to be developed, but the intellect also must be enlightened and satisfied. Spiritual realisation and experience, an intuitive and direct knowledge, a growth of inner consciousness, a growth of the soul and of an intimate soul-perception, soul-vision and a soul-sense, are indeed the proper means of this evolution: but the support of the reflective and critical reason is also of great importance, in the whole movement indispensable. The means by which this need can be satisfied and with which our nature of mind has provided us is philosophy, and in this field it must be a spiritual philosophy. The method was at first an intuitive seeing and an intuitive expression, as in the fathomless thought and profound language of the Upanishads, but afterwards there was developed a critical method, a firm system of dialectics, a logical organisation. In the West where the syncretic tendency of the consciousness was replaced by the analytic and separative, the spiritual urge and the intellectual reason parted company almost at the outset; philosophy took from the first a turn towards a purely intellectual and ratiocinative explanation of things. But still this line of development too is necessary, because there must be a bridge between the spirit and the intellectual reason. For the transformation of the Ignorance into the integral Knowledge, the growth in us of a spiritual intelligence ready to receive a higher light and canalise it for all the parts of our nature is an intermediate necessity of great importance.
But it is only by an inner realisation of what these approaches are seeking after, by an overwhelming experience or by many experiences building up an inner change, by a transmutation of the consciousness, by a liberation of the spirit from its present veil of mind, life and body that there can emerge the spiritual being. That is the final line of the soul’s progress. It is only after spiritual experience through the heart and mind we see arise the saint, the prophet, the Rishi, the Yogi, the seer, the spiritual sage and the mystic, and it is the religions in which these types of spiritual manhood came into being that have endured, covered the globe and given mankind all its spiritual aspiration and culture.
The sage and seer live in the spiritual mind, their thought or their vision is governed and moulded by an inner or a greater divine light of knowledge; the devotee lives in the spiritual aspiration of the heart, its self-offering and its seeking; the saint is moved by the awakened psychic being in the inner heart grown powerful to govern the emotional and vital being; the others stand in the vital kinetic nature driven by a higher spiritual energy and turned by it towards an inspired action, a God-given work or mission, the service of some divine Power, idea or ideal. The last or highest emergence is the liberated man who has realised the Self and Spirit within him, entered into the cosmic consciousness, passed into union with the Eternal and, so far as he still accepts life and action, acts by the light and energy of the Power within him working through his human instruments of Nature.
This has been up till now the course of Nature’s evolution of the spiritual man in the human mental being. Be it, however, noted that spirituality cannot be called upon to deal with life by a non-spiritual method or attempt to cure its ills by the panaceas, the political, social or other mechanical remedies which the mind is constantly attempting and which have always failed and will continue to fail to solve anything. To discover the spiritual being in himself is the main business of the spiritual man and to help others towards the same evolution is his real service to the race; till that is done, an outward help can succour and alleviate, but nothing or very little more is possible.
But the spiritual evolution of Nature is still in process and incomplete,—one might almost say, still only beginning,—and its main preoccupation has been to affirm and develop a basis of spiritual consciousness and knowledge and to create more and more a foundation or formation for the vision of that which is eternal in the truth of the spirit. In the meanwhile, the individual must be preoccupied with his own problem of entirely changing his mind and life into conformity with the truth of the spirit which he is achieving or has achieved in his inner being and knowledge. Any premature attempt at a large-scale collective spiritual life is exposed to vitiation by some incompleteness of the spiritual knowledge on its dynamic side, by the imperfections of the individual seekers and by the invasion of the ordinary mind and vital and physical consciousness taking hold of the truth and mechanising, obscuring or corrupting it.
Spiritual truth is a truth of the spirit, not a truth of the intellect, not a mathematical theorem or a logical formula. It is a truth of the Infinite and it can assume an infinite variety of aspects and formations: in the spiritual evolution it is inevitable that there should be a many-sided passage and reaching to the one Truth, a many-sided seizing of it. The fundamental truth of spiritual experience is one, its consciousness is one. But also there are numberless possibilities of variation of experience and expression. In the evolution of the spiritual man there are many stages and in each stage a great variety of individual formations of the being, the consciousness, the life, the temperament, the ideas, the character. In the domain of pure spiritual self-realisation and self-expression there need not be a single white monotone, there can be a great diversity in unity; the supreme Self is one, but the souls of the Self are many and, as is the soul’s formation of nature, so will be its spiritual self-expression. Diversity in oneness is the law of the manifestation; the supramental unification and integration must harmonise these diversities, but to abolish them is not the intention of the Spirit in Nature.
But there is a farther intention,—not only a revelation of the Spirit, but a radical and integral transformation of Nature. There is a will in her to effectuate a true manifestation of the embodied life of the Spirit, to complete what she has begun by a passage from the Ignorance to the Knowledge, to throw off her mask and to reveal herself as the luminous Consciousness-Force carrying in her the eternal Existence and its universal Delight of being. Which means, much has still to be done, bhūri aspaşţa kartvam. What the evolutionary Power has done so far was to make a few individuals aware of their souls, conscious of their selves, aware of the eternal being that they are: a certain change of nature prepares, accompanies or follows upon this illumination, but it is not the complete and radical change. When this is done the spiritual man would have evolved, but not the supramental being who shall thenceforward be the leader of that Nature.
As the evolution proceeds, Nature begins slowly and tentatively to manifest our occult parts. The soul in us, the psychic principle, has already begun to take secret form; it puts forward and develops a soul-personality, a distinct psychic being to represent it. This psychic being remains still behind the veil in our subliminal part, like the true mental, the true vital or the true or subtle physical being within us: but, like them, it acts on the surface life by the influences and intimations it throws up upon that surface. On this ignorant surface we become dimly aware of something that can be called a soul as distinct from mind, life or body. A certain sensitive feeling for all that is true and good and beautiful, fine and pure and noble, a response to it, a demand for it, a pressure on mind and life to accept and formulate it in our thought, feelings, conduct, character is the most usually recognised though not the sole sign of this influence of the psyche.
The psychic being, the soul-personality in us, does not emerge full-grown and luminous; it evolves, passes through a slow development and formation. Its appearance is the sign of a soul-emergence in Nature, and if that emergence is as yet small and defective, the psychic personality also will be stunted or feeble. It is too separated from its inner reality, in imperfect communication with its own source in the depths of the being. But as the psychic personality grows stronger, it begins to increase its communion with the psychic entity behind it and improve its communications with the surface.
A first condition of the soul’s complete emergence is a direct contact in the surface being with the spiritual Reality. Because it comes from that, the psychic element in us turns always towards whatever in phenomenal Nature seems to belong to a higher Reality and can be accepted as its sign and character. But, for this change to arrive at its widest totality and profound completeness, the consciousness has to shift its centre and its static and dynamic position from the surface to the inner being; it is there that we must find the foundation for our thought, life and action. The outer nature has to undergo a change of poise, a quieting, a purification and fine mutation of its substance and energy by which the many obstacles in it rarefy, drop away or otherwise disappear.
Even before the outer nature has been effected or before it is sufficient, one can still break down the wall screening our inner being from our outer awareness by a strong force of call and aspiration, a vehement will or violent effort or an effective discipline or process; but this may be a premature movement and is not without its serious dangers. The perils were well-known to a past spiritual experience and have been met by imposing the necessity of initiation, of discipline, of methods of purification and testing by ordeal, of an entire submission to the directions of the path-finder or path-leader, one who has realised the Truth and himself possesses and is able to communicate the light, the experience, a guide who is strong to take by the hand and carry over difficult passages as well as to instruct and point out the way. But even so the dangers will be there and can only be surmounted if there is or there grows up a complete sincerity, a will for purity, a readiness for obedience to the Truth, for surrender to the Highest, a readiness to lose or to subject to a divine yoke the limiting and self-affirming ego.
A highest spiritual transformation must intervene on the psychic or psycho-spiritual change; the psychic movement inward to the inner being, the Self or Divinity within us, must be completed by an opening upward to a supreme spiritual status or a higher existence. This can be done by our opening into what is above us, by an ascent of consciousness into the ranges of overmind and supramental nature in which the sense of Self and Spirit is ever unveiled and permanent and in which the instrumentation of the Self and Spirit is not restricted or divided as in our mind-nature, life-nature, body-nature. The psychic change also makes this possible; it opens us to the cosmic consciousness, also to what is now superconscient to our normality. An early illumination from above can come as an outcome of aspiration or some inner readiness. But if it is brought about by a premature pressure from below, it can be attended with difficulties and dangers. The choice, however, does not always rest with our will, for the operations of the spiritual evolution in us are very various, and according to the line it has followed will be the turn taken at any critical phase by the action of the Consciousness-Force in its urge towards a higher self-manifestation and formation of our existence.
If the spirit could from the first dwell securely on the superior heights, a complete spiritual transformation might be rapid. When the psychic change is complete, this can happen by a painless process. Otherwise a premature pulling down of the higher Forces may be too strong for the flawed and impure material of Nature and its immediate fate may be that of the unbaked jar of the Veda which could not hold the divine Soma Wine; or the descending influence may withdraw or be spilt because the nature cannot contain or keep it. There might even be some undivine Force trying to seize it and use it for the purposes of the Adversary. If the work were done from above, from some spiritual height, there might be a sublimation or uplifting or the creation of a new Structure compelled by the sheer force of the influence from above: but this change might not be accepted as native to itself by the lower being; it would not be a total growth, an integral evolution. A light and power of the Overmind working in its own full right and in its own sphere is one thing, the same light working in the obscurity of the physical consciousness and under its conditions is something quite different and, owing to dilution and mixture, far inferior in its knowledge and force and results.
This is indeed the reason of the slow and difficult emergence of the Consciousness-Force in Nature: for Mind and Life have to descend into Matter and suit themselves to its conditions; changed and diminished by the obscurity and reluctant inertia of the substance and force in which they work, they are not able to make a complete transformation of their material into a fit instrument and a changed substance revelatory of their real and native power. The Life-consciousness is unable to effectuate the greatness and felicity of its mighty or beautiful impulses in the material existence; its impetus fails it, its force of effectuation is inferior to the truth of its conceptions, the form betrays the Life-intuition within it which it tries to render into terms of Life-being. The Mind is unable to achieve its high ideas in the medium of Life or Matter without deductions and compromises which deprive them of their divinity; its clarities of knowledge and will are not matched by its force to mould this inferior substance to obey and express it: on the contrary, its own powers get affected, its will is divided, its knowledge confused and clouded by the turbidities of life and the incomprehensiveness of Matter. Neither Life nor Mind succeeds in converting or perfecting the material existence. But the higher spiritual-mental powers also undergo the same disability when they descend into Life and Matter; they can do much more, achieve much luminous change, but the result is a diminished creation.
Only the Supermind can descend without losing its full power of action, its action always intrinsic and automatic, its will and knowledge identical and the result commensurate: its nature is a self-achieving Truth-Consciousness and, if it limits itself or limits its working, it is by choice and intention, not by compulsion; in the limits it chooses its action and the results of its action are harmonious and inevitable. As the psychic change has to call in the spiritual to complete it, so the first spiritual change has to call in the supramental transformation to complete it. The whole radical change in the evolution from a basis of Ignorance to a basis of Knowledge can only come by the intervention of the supramental Power and its direct action in earth-existence.
Even from this hurried paraphrasing of the wide sweep of vision given by Sri Aurobindo for the future of man we do get an idea of the progress that has been made in the long and slow course of evolution. But the path moves on and the worthwhile transitional state has to lead to the coming of the superman or the gnostic being. Man is a mental being incarnate in a living body. His original form first appears in the world of Mind; the mental Purusha prepares in that world his body to house Mind. Then, as the Upanishad says, “by breaking open a door in Matter” he enters into it: the Manomaya Purusha’s body takes the physical body. Prakriti in the terrestrial process ultimately gives a form prepared by this Purusha. Similarly too came about the Pranamaya Purusha’s appearance in the physical mould. But a radical transformation takes place in the Vijnanamaya Purusha’s preparing his body first in his world on the basis of the Truth-conscient Substance and then being born on earth. This does not happen easily. “I purify earth and heaven by the Truth,”—says boldly the Vedic Rishi. Even the great heavens have to be purified for this eventuality to materialise. The spiritual mind going all the way up to the overmental has to open itself to the supramental possibilities. Sri Aurobindo’s own work was to prepare for the Vijnanamaya Purusha his body in that world, the golden body of Agni as the Vedic Rishi would say. That he achieved.
I get puzzled when very knowledgeable people say that Savitri is The Life Divine in a verse form!
by RY Deshpande on Sun 18 Nov 2007 09:01 PM PST Permanent Link
And fills his days with her celestial clasp,
She stooped to make her home in transient shapes;
In Matter’s womb she cast the Immortal’s fire,
In the unfeeling Vast woke thought and hope,
Smote with her charm and beauty flesh and nerve
And forced delight on earth’s insensible frame.
Alive and clad with trees and herbs and flowers
Earth’s great brown body smiled towards the skies,
Azure replied to azure in the sea’s laugh;
New sentient creatures filled the unseen depths,
Life’s glory and swiftness ran in the beauty of beasts,
Man dared and thought and met with his soul the world.
But while the magic breath was on its way,
Before her gifts could reach our prisoned hearts,
A dark ambiguous Presence questioned all.
The secret Will that robes itself with Night
And offers to spirit the ordeal of the flesh,
Imposed a mystic mask of death and pain.
Interned now in the slow and suffering years
Sojourns the winged and wonderful wayfarer
And can no more recall her happier state,
But must obey the inert Inconscient’s law,
Insensible foundation of a world
In which blind limits are on beauty laid
And sorrow and joy as struggling comrades live.
A dim and dreadful muteness fell on her.
This is a remarkable description which we can find only in Savitri and not in other prose works of Sri Aurobindo, for instance in The Life Divine or The Synthesis of Yoga where the presentation is essentially for the enlightened intuitive reason. There is a certain degree of informality available in the letters Sri Aurobindo wrote to his disciples and one can see in them that he is quite free from professional constraints which otherwise he has to observe in formal writings. But everywhere there is the tightness in the line of argument, if these are to be considered as arguments. In that sense in Savitri alone the occult comes out with its full luminous contents and force, with its unplumbable profundity, gold reaching yet deeper layers of gold, in Savitri where Sri Aurobindo the Yogi has complete freedom of expression, has no boundary conditions to be observed, where no horizons cut his view, where he can be, so to say, himself, absolutely himself. The Story of Creation narrated by him in Savitri belongs unmistakably to that category. In The Life Divine he had taken a position, in The Synthesis of Yoga he had taken a position; but in Savitri it is all unimpeded revelation, in it he had poured himself out in God’s great glory itself. So, I get puzzled when very knowledgeable people say that Savitri is The Life Divine in a verse form!
And yet there can be an essay in poetry, with its convincing logopoeia supported by image and music. The following description of the cosmic past and the future that awaits this creation is a wonderful example of the expository art carried out with utmost care and attention. Savitri is told by a deathless and mighty Voice to remember why she had taken the mortal birth and that she should get ready to house the divine Force in her soul in order to conquer Death. She has been initiated into Yoga and the review of the entire cosmic past is the first occult-spiritual experience she gets. The mystic-numinous origins of the shadowy beginnings are first disclosed to her: (pp. 477-86)
In the indeterminate formlessness of Self
Creation took its first mysterious steps,
It made the body’s shape a house of soul
And Matter learned to think and person grew;
She saw Space peopled with the seeds of life
And saw the human creature born in Time.
At first appeared a dim half-neutral tide
Of being emerging out of infinite Nought…
All was the deed of a blind World-Energy:
Unconscious of her own exploits she worked,
Shaping a universe out of the Inane…
On a dim ocean of subconscient life
A formless surface consciousness awoke:
A stream of thoughts and feelings came and went…
A conscious being was by this labour made;
It looked around it on its difficult field
In the green wonderful and perilous earth;
It hoped in a brief body to survive,
Relying on Matter’s false eternity…
This is the little surface of man's life.
He is this and he is all the universe;
He scales the Unseen, his depths dare the Abyss;
A whole mysterious world is locked within…
The immaculate Divine All-Wonderful
Casts into the argent purity of his soul
His splendour and his greatness and the light
Of self-creation in Time’s infinity
As into a sublimely mirroring glass.
Man in the world’s life works out the dreams of God.
But all is there, even God’s opposites…
Man’s house of life holds not the gods alone:
There are occult Shadows, there are tenebrous Powers,
Inhabitants of life’s ominous nether rooms,
A shadowy world's stupendous denizens.
A careless guardian of his nature's powers,
Man harbours dangerous forces in his house…
Afflicting the daylight and alarming night,
Invading at will his outer tenement
The stark gloom's grisly dire inhabitants
Mounting into God's light all light perturb…
Man’s lower nature hides these awful guests.
Their vast contagion grips sometimes man’s world.
An awful insurgence overpowers man's soul…
An opposite potency contradicting God,
A momentary Evil’s almightiness
Has straddled the straight path of Nature’s acts.
It imitates the Godhead it denies,
Puts on his figure and assumes his face…
But there is a guardian power, there are Hands that save,
Calm eyes divine regard the human scene.
All the world’s possibilities in man
Are waiting as the tree waits in its seed:
His past lives in him; it drives his future's pace;
His present’s acts fashion his coming fate.
The unborn gods hide in his house of Life…
Only a little has will and purposed pace.
A vast subliminal is man’s measureless part.
The dim subconscient is his cavern base…
A portion of us lives in present Time,
A secret mass in dim inconscience gropes;
Out of the inconscient and subliminal
Arisen, we live in mind's uncertain light
And strive to know and master a dubious world
Whose purpose and meaning are hidden from our sight.
Above us dwells a superconscient god
Hidden in the mystery of his own light:
Around us is a vast of ignorance
Lit by the uncertain ray of human mind,
Below us sleeps the Inconscient dark and mute.
But this is only Matter’s first self-view,
A scale and series in the Ignorance.
This is not all we are or all our world.
Our greater self of knowledge waits for us,
A supreme light in the truth-conscious Vast:
It sees from summits beyond thinking mind,
It moves in a splendid air transcending life.
It shall descend and make earth’s life divine.
Bacon aptly depicts that spongy indecisiveness of mind that can masquerade as "being critical"
Skeptical Inquirer, Nov, 2000 by Barbara Friedberg Long ago, Bacon asserted that science must begin with doubts in order to end in certainties, a paradox that stills leads to misunderstandings about Bacon and about science.
Bacon saw that good thinking is a sort of paradox. The mind is all too effective, not only in feeling and imagining, but even in reasoning. Fastening on one idea, it traces implications, follows up parallels, leaps to conclusions, and creates a tight and persuasive system of beliefs. This power can be useful, if properly disciplined, but it tends to shrug aside direct observation of nature. Man, according to Bacon, does nor have a privileged intuition into the construction of the cosmos--a direct link to the Creator's intentions--as many then believed. He must let the actions of nature in the uncontrollable future be the arbiters of his theory's soundness. Initial speculations must issue in a well-formulated experiment, and that, in turn, must yield to a sensory judgment of the experiment's result. Though Bacon didn't think of double-blind testing, he saw that these stages must be made as distinct from each other as possible (1960; 2, 50). Bacon called endemic human limitations "Idols of the Tribe." Even the cleverest minds leap to generalizations, notice striking events more than typical ones, and seek out supportive data more than counter examples. They fasten on apparent patterns too quickly and don't let go.
"Idols of the Cave" were the individual's limitations and enthusiasms. He may apply favorite ideas or remedies to every-thing, like a wonder drug.
"Idols of the Marketplace" were the limitations of common language, suitable for everyday life, but not to describe nature accurately. "Substance," "heavy," "moist," and "dense" were all vague terms. New words must refer to measurable physical phenomena (1960, 41--60).
In developing these ideas, Bacon outlined a devastating critique that might well doom any science.
When the human mind has once despaired of finding truth, its interest in all things grows fainter, and the result is that men turn aside to pleasant disputatious and discourses and roam as it were from object to object ... a wandering kind of inquiry that leads to nothing. (Bacon, 1874, III, 364; 1960, 88, 67.) But he rejected the immobile skepticism, common at that time, which doubted whether any human theory about nature would ever be a clear advance. Some raise doubts, he said, as lawyers do, without any aim of settling a question. They may embrace a "deliberate and factitious despair" of learning anything new, for the sake of thinking their own thought perfect. Here Bacon aptly depicts that spongy indecisiveness of mind that can masquerade as "being critical." Today many academics, having grown uneasy about the concept of seeking truth, deal mainly in ingenious detractions, aimed at proving that various forms of supposed excellence are really (but not "in truth") invidious shams (see Haack 1999). If public debate is mere entertainment and debunking is an automatic reflex with no drive to find central, usable insights, we are imitating the learned men whom Bacon criticized, whose scholarship sought just to get by according to some group's limited conventions. But Bacon wanted people to address great issues and strive to be adequate to their demands.